Allow each workspace to define custom statuses (e.g., "Legal Review", "Tech QA") and map them to a status type. This supports local process naming while maintaining standardized reporting.
Enable granular rules for each status, specifying which users or roles can perform actions such as edit, comment, request changes, approve, schedule release, or publish. Rules can enforce required checks (e.g., approvals, validations) and control status transitions (e.g., Review β Approved requires two approvals).
Define core status types: Draft, Review, Approved, Released. These represent the standard lifecycle stages for content progression.
Display the current status, required actions, blockers, and provide a complete audit trail of status transitions, approvals, and rule evaluations.
No description available
No description available
No description available
No description available
No description available
No description available
No description available
Related requirement tasks from other projects
Description Platform Status: will be supported PPT Status: Roadmap MVP: Yes Must Have: Priority 1 (A) Notes Delve into review requirements and investigate Have functional requirements of web review tool
View in Azure DevOps βDescription: Allows multiple reviewers with configurable approval order. Platform Status: supported PPT Status: Roadmap MVP: Yes Must Have: Priority 1 (A) Notes already Assign users for specific roles Check if it's all or one of the reviewers needs to be able to approve. Discussion thread between reviewers Not just comment on the object, but the specific parts Get very clear configs (business rules) from AGCO Based on product line When sending it out for review is it when: You configure the review workflow Is it pre-configured Pick one config to demo. Notes: Assign users for roles; check all or one approval conditions; discussion threads; comment on specific parts; business rules from AGCO; product-line-based configuration; config demos.
View in Azure DevOps βDescription Supports multi-level workflows for translation/review tied to Windchill. Platform Status: will be supported PPT Status: Roadmap MVP: Yes Must Have: Priority 1 (A) Use Case not started, in work/draft, in review, review complete,in translation, translation complete, ready to publish, publishedβ¦) Current Challenges Current toolset is limited to the workflows that are approved program-wide. Tech info wa more specific workflow needs. Notes In place when translation and review are implemented Has to do with Windchill need more tech writer, information architect focused. Notes: In place when translation/review implemented; requires tech writer/info architect focus.
View in Azure DevOps β